
Environmental Conservation Grants
Learn about grants for environmental conservation by browsing our curated list of top conservation funders below. Related funders may be found in the guides for climate change, marine conservation and animals & wildlife. Members can also research environmental funding opportunities using the search tool for GrantFinder. Become a member.
Key Funders
- Bezos Earth Fund
- Bloomberg Philanthropies
- Chicago Community Trust
- Global Greengrants Fund
- Foundation for the Carolinas
- The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- The Kresge Foundation
- The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- McKnight Foundation
- Richard King Mellon Foundation
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Network for Good
- The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- Rockefeller Foundation
- Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors
- Sea Change Foundation
- Silicon Valley Community Foundation
- Tides Foundation
- Walton Family Foundation
Funding trends for environmental conservation
While governmental funding dominates environmental conservation, philanthropy fills important gaps, backing research, resourcing grassroots groups, and more. Environmental grantmaking is on the rise, but only represents about 3.8% of all U.S. charitable giving in 2023, according to Giving USA. As climate risks multiply, environmental conservation grants increasingly intersect with climate philanthropy, as conservation groups evolve their work.
Large private foundations and individual major donors still dominate the environmental funding landscape. That said, place-based private foundations offer crucial conservation investments focused on specific geographic areas. Community foundations are also important both for their local conservation efforts and in their role as hosts of donor-advised funds, through which many individual donors give for conservation.
History of environmental conservation philanthropy
Conservation philanthropy historically took a preservationist approach sometimes referred to as “fortress conservation” or “protectionist” conservation” prioritized the creation of protected areas untouched by humans. This led to displacement of and even violence against Indigenous peoples in several areas. For the last few decades, funders have been moving to a more people-centered approach to conservation that acknowledges and includes Indigenous peoples and traditional land stewards.
Where are environmental conservation grants going?
Conservation grants have, in recent years, seen increasing collaboration between various organizations, often coordinated by intermediaries like CLIMA Fund and green groups that also act as regrantors, such as the Nature Conservancy and Environmental Defense Fund.
Environmental funders increasingly support, as IP has reported, Indigenous-led conservation efforts. Investments in conservation finance, such as the Nature Conservancy’s Blue Bonds for Ocean Conservation and the World Wildlife Fund’s impact investing initiative, have also increased. The Community Land Rights and Conservation Finance Initiative, new international funding mechanism, works to shift both public and private funds to support “Indigenous Peoples’, Afro-descendant peoples’, and local communities’ land rights, conservation, and sustainable management of their territories.”
Grantmaking for environmental conservation often intersects with funding for climate, animals and wildlife, marine and freshwater, and sustainable agriculture.
Environmental grants support a diverse array of nonprofits across the world. The majority of funding from U.S.-based foundations prioritizes large, established organizations, sometimes known as the “big greens,” which include the National Audubon Society, the Nature Conservancy, and the World Wide Fund for Nature. A growing ecosystem of environmental intermediaries is increasing the number of grants to smaller and grassroots organizations. Conservation grants also fund research organizations and think tanks, as well as to support advocacy to change the conditions that threaten habitats and ecosystems.
That said, the majority of environmental grants from U.S. foundations invest in nonprofits in the state or region where the funder is based (Yale School of the Environment). As discussed above, global giving for the environment often occurs through U.S.-based intermediaries that regrant funds to local organizations in other parts of the world.
Gaps in funding for environmental conservation
While a growing number of grantmakers increase funding for Indigenous-led conservation efforts, this focus area remains severely underfunded. Examining grants from U.S. institutional funders from 2016 to 2020, International Funders for Indigenous Peoples found that only 0.6% of all giving benefited Indigenous peoples – on all issues, not only environmental conservation. Indigenous peoples account for 6.2% of the global population, have a moral claim to their lands, and could be leading the way on environmental conservation.
A 2021 report by InDEEP (Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity in Environmental Philanthropy) found a $2.7 billion funding gap between white-led and BIPOC-led environmental and conservation organizations in the years 2014 to 2018. Further in this vein, a 2023 report from the Yale School of the Environment identified a gap in funding for BIPOC-led environmental organizations, as well as for organizations focused on environmental justice.
Published on
Additional Resources
Environmental Grantmakers Association is a network of more than 200 foundations around the world that focuses on a range of environmental issues, including conservation and pollution.
International Union for Conservation of Nature is a global membership organization composed of both government and civil society organisations that has a wide array of conservation tools, issues briefs and publications available focused on the protection of the natural world.
Climate Action Network claims to be the world’s largest network of civil society with a focus on addressing fossil fuels, including pollution mitigation.
